[PRINT this page]
[E-MAIL a friend]
[send us feedback]
[home]
[link]
Straight Talk About Iraqi 'Sovereignty'
based on a report by Juan Cole. November 2, 2005
Iraqi President Jalal Talabani said Tuesday before the United Nations: "I categorically refuse the use of Iraqi soil to launch a military strike against Syria or any other Arab country ... But at the end of the day my ability to confront the US military is limited and I cannot impose on them my will."
So let's get this straight.
The president of Iraq elected six months after the US "turned over sovereignty" on June 28, 2004 is saying before the United Nations that George W. Bush and Donald Rumsfeld decide whether his country can be used as a base to attack other countries, and he is unable to influence such decisions -- even though he categorically rejects any such action.
For all those "Bush's Iraq" boosters who laud the "democratic" elections of January 30 and the recent constitutional referendum, this clear admission that Iraq remains under American military occupation, and that its government is helpless before American decisions about the fate of Iraq, is a rather strong refutation.
After all, no country is a "democracy" where the military calls the shots, overruling the civilian president -- how much less so if it is a foreign military!
Talabani is saying that Iraq is more like Burma, Pakistan or the Sudan than it is like democracies such as India or Brazil.
You have been reading excerpts from "Talabani Opposes Military Action against Syria: Admits Helplessness" by Juan Cole. You can read the entire piece here: tinyurl.com/7o6dv. Thanks to Juan Cole. We visit juancole.com often and we hope you will too.
based on a report by Juan Cole. November 2, 2005
Iraqi President Jalal Talabani said Tuesday before the United Nations: "I categorically refuse the use of Iraqi soil to launch a military strike against Syria or any other Arab country ... But at the end of the day my ability to confront the US military is limited and I cannot impose on them my will."
So let's get this straight.
The president of Iraq elected six months after the US "turned over sovereignty" on June 28, 2004 is saying before the United Nations that George W. Bush and Donald Rumsfeld decide whether his country can be used as a base to attack other countries, and he is unable to influence such decisions -- even though he categorically rejects any such action.
For all those "Bush's Iraq" boosters who laud the "democratic" elections of January 30 and the recent constitutional referendum, this clear admission that Iraq remains under American military occupation, and that its government is helpless before American decisions about the fate of Iraq, is a rather strong refutation.
After all, no country is a "democracy" where the military calls the shots, overruling the civilian president -- how much less so if it is a foreign military!
Talabani is saying that Iraq is more like Burma, Pakistan or the Sudan than it is like democracies such as India or Brazil.
You have been reading excerpts from "Talabani Opposes Military Action against Syria: Admits Helplessness" by Juan Cole. You can read the entire piece here: tinyurl.com/7o6dv. Thanks to Juan Cole. We visit juancole.com often and we hope you will too.
