[PRINT this page]
[E-MAIL a friend]
[send us feedback]
[home]
[link]
Do I See A Pattern Here?
excerpts from a report by William Bowles
It’s too early to say with any certainty who set off the four bombs that caused death and chaos in London today but predictably Tony Blair says “they were obviously designed to coincide with the G8 summit”.
He would say that, wouldn’t he?
My immediate reaction is to be suspicious not about the timing of the bombs, but who exactly is behind them.
It’s been almost four years since 9/11 without a single bombing in the UK but with dire warnings being handed out at regular intervals – “not if but when” etc.
And with hundreds arrested under anti-terror laws but not a single conviction of anyone actually proved as being a member of al-Qu’eda or even being caught red-handed with a bomb, it’s safe to assume that it’s unlikely that al-Qu’eda actually exists as an effective organisation, let alone operates an ‘international terror network’.
Given Osama bin Laden‘s proven connection to the CIA as a paid ‘asset’ for at least ten years prior to 9/11 coupled to the years of chasing him without so much as a sighting, it’s pretty obvious that the US have no intention of actually catching the bugger.
Instead, we get handed a new bogeyman in the form of Abu Musab al-Zarqawi who predictably proves to be as elusive as the fabled Osama. Is it just me, or do I see a pattern here?
You have been reading excerpts from "al-Qu’eda or al-a’diversion?" by William Bowles. You can read the entire piece here: williambowles.info/actions/london_bomb.html.
excerpts from a report by William Bowles
It’s too early to say with any certainty who set off the four bombs that caused death and chaos in London today but predictably Tony Blair says “they were obviously designed to coincide with the G8 summit”.
He would say that, wouldn’t he?
My immediate reaction is to be suspicious not about the timing of the bombs, but who exactly is behind them.
It’s been almost four years since 9/11 without a single bombing in the UK but with dire warnings being handed out at regular intervals – “not if but when” etc.
And with hundreds arrested under anti-terror laws but not a single conviction of anyone actually proved as being a member of al-Qu’eda or even being caught red-handed with a bomb, it’s safe to assume that it’s unlikely that al-Qu’eda actually exists as an effective organisation, let alone operates an ‘international terror network’.
Given Osama bin Laden‘s proven connection to the CIA as a paid ‘asset’ for at least ten years prior to 9/11 coupled to the years of chasing him without so much as a sighting, it’s pretty obvious that the US have no intention of actually catching the bugger.
Instead, we get handed a new bogeyman in the form of Abu Musab al-Zarqawi who predictably proves to be as elusive as the fabled Osama. Is it just me, or do I see a pattern here?
You have been reading excerpts from "al-Qu’eda or al-a’diversion?" by William Bowles. You can read the entire piece here: williambowles.info/actions/london_bomb.html.
